Linux distribution reviews and articles - my search for the perfect distro

Fluxbuntu 7.10 RC review

December 17, 2007 – 7:58 pm | by Cosmin

What is Fluxbuntu?

Fluxbuntu was created for the user who wishes to utilize the massively popular and versatile Ubuntu distribution base while minimizing the impact on their system’s resources. To this end, we firmly believe that Fluxbuntu is the wisest choice for anyone seeking a low profile operating system — from performance enthusiasts to people who need a lightweight operating system to breathe new life into an old computer.


Long story short: Fluxbuntu is a distributions based on Ubuntu which aims to provide a lightweight, productive, agile, and efficient system. It uses the Fluxbox windowmanager. If you now start thinking “And what’s the difference between Fluxbuntu and Ubuntu with Fluxbuntu?”, the FAQ gives a pretty good answer:

Contrary to popular opinion, the Flux in fluxbuntu does not signify Fluxbox. The choice of window manager is coincidental. Fluxbuntu attempts to make sane application selection and daemon removal as well as providing a series of useful setup configurations and scripts. This includes items such as automounting, a resolution changing applet, and a few other additions to make your Fluxbuntu usage easier.

Tested version

The tested version is Fluxbuntu 7.10 Release Candidate, which is based on Ubuntu Gutsy. As you can see, it is not a final version, altough Ubuntu Gutsy was released a while ago. Anyway, I haven’t encountered any major problem. Maybe I’m just lucky :) Anyway, I got assured on the IRC channel that there is going to be a 7.10 final version. By the way, the ISO image is pretty small, only 300 MB.

Minimum Specs?

Fluxbuntu uses 35-46mb of ram. If you have 64MB of ram we would definitely recommend having adequate swap space.

Installation

Unlike the previous Dapper-based version I tested a while ago, this release is not using a live-cd based installer, it is using the Debian installer, which is based on ncurses. I find this a better choice, as Fluxbuntu targets old computers. Old computers + live OS -> poor performance.

Now, I must say that I like the simple, clean design of the boot menu.

Fluxbuntu boot menu

The installation processes is pretty straightforward, and if you have some Linux background, you shouldn’t encounter any problem. If you don’t have, search some documentation about installing Debian. The first few pages from “The perfect desktop - Debian Etch” should help.

First impression

I really like this neat design. Have a look at the login screen (slim is the login manager) and at the desktop. I think this is the best look I’ve ever seen at Fluxbox.

Flubox login screen

Fluxbuntu default desktop

We can see that ROX is used. It adds support for desktop icons and background images. It is also used as a file manager.

There are 5 shortcuts on the desktop: Home (ROX filemanager), the good old Console (uxterm), Editor (Leafpad), Browser (Kazehakase) and Chat (Pidgin).

In-depth analysis

As you may have noticed, Fluxbuntu isn’t using the common programs for a specific task (eg. Firefox as a browser), because the developers tried to find lighter alternatives without losing too much functionality. And in my opinion, they did found good applications. Of course that if you are a web developer you’ll probably want Firefox instead of Kazehakase, BUT you can install it easily with apt-get or synaptic.

Remaining in the field of browsers, as web browsing is one of the thing you’ll probably want to do with an old computer, you may ask yourself what is and how good is Kazehakase working. It is a simple browser, using the gecko engine, with support for tabbed browsing and RSS feeds. It renders web pages exactly like Firefox. Better yet, it uses mostly the same keyboard shortcuts, and (update) it supports Flash.

Installed packages (exactly as in the menu):

  • Editors - AbiWord (Word processor), Leafpad (graphical text editor), Nano (console text editor)
  • Graphics - Dia (This is one of the cool programs I’m really excited to discover. It is a nice diagram creator. This means less time lost when creating the diagrams for my physics homework. Huray!)
  • Net - Claws Mail (Another alternative, this one for Evolution or Thunderbird. It has lots of features and it is fast. I’m considering replacing Thunderbird with it.), Kazehakase (already discussed), network-config (graphical interface for configuring the network cards), Telnet, w3m (console web browser)
  • Programming - Python
  • Shells - Bash, Dash, Sh
  • Sound - Alsamixergui (graphical mixer for Alsa), wmxmms (not working), xmms (Light GTK1 music player. Considered obsolete by many, but… well, it works.)
  • System - Admin - alsaconf (ALSA setup), pppconfig (ncurses PPP setup tool)
  • System - Aptitude (ncurses package manager), gvidm (tool for changing X11 resolution without restarting the server), DSL/PPPoE configuration tool, pstree (running processes tree), ROX Filer (file manager, same as Home from
  • Desktop), Synaptic (package manager), tasksel (ncurses tool to install “software collections”, such as “LAMP server”), Top (console tool for displaying running tasks)
  • Tools - different fluxbox configuration utilities, Xarchiver (lightweight archive manager)
  • Viewers - ImageMagick (image viewer), VLC (media player), Xpdf (PDF viewer), zxgv (another image viewer)

One of the things I like about Fluxbuntu is that it integrates console applications in the menu. I also like that it asks for you password when you try to shutdown or reboot it. Now that I’m in this area, it supports standby and hibernate out of the box.

Conclusion

It’s Linux. It’s lightweight. You have access to Ubuntu repositories. Good choice of default applications. –> it’s a very good choice for old computers. I’m going to install it on my parent’s computer (P2 @ 400 MHz, 128 MB RAM). As they use it for internet browsing, Fluxbuntu seems almost the perfect choice.

Also, some of the programs included with Fluxbuntu may be better, in some cases, than “classic” applications that do the same thing (Claws Mail vs Thunderbird or Evolution, AbiWord vs OpenOffice.org), on any distribution,.

Links

Home page: fluxbuntu.org

Support: wiki.fluxbuntu.org/index.php?title=Help

Distrowatch homepage: distrowatch.com/fluxbuntu

Tags: , ,

Related Post

  1. 13 Responses to “Fluxbuntu 7.10 RC review”
  2. By Eyes-Only on Dec 18, 2007 | Reply

    Great review that you’ve given here! I had no idea that Fluxbuntu’s Dev Team had taken such care in assembling this distro as they had, nor in making it as lite-weight (at 300mg for the .iso file). I’ve been trying to keep abreast of this project ever since I caught wind of it over the net but the news has been so difficult to come by. I’m very glad to now see that they have an RC out and that it performs so well, etc.

    Thank you very much for this review! I appreciate your time in testing and reporting on this. I’m hoping though that they’ll come out with a LiveCD so that I can give it a try soon though I can see their reasoning behind an install-only disk.

    Eyes-Only

  3. By Jesper Sandström on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply

    Kazehakase does indeed support flash :) Please correct the speculation in your article, so that you do not scare people away from such a great lightweight browser

  4. By Designer Kid on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply

    dude fix up the very first link :)

  5. By Cosmin on Dec 19, 2007 | Reply

    Jesper: Fixed in the article. I was expecting a message from the browser on a page containing flash if the plugin was not installed. But you are right, it works after installing mozilla-plugin-gnash.

    Designer Kid: Fixed.

    Thanks for pointing out this mistakes.

  6. By Memo on Dec 26, 2007 | Reply

    How can you make Kazehakase to support flash in fluxbuntu?

  7. By Memo on Dec 26, 2007 | Reply

    Cosmin,

    I just saw the response of my question in your last post.

    Thanks

  8. By Marti on Jan 5, 2008 | Reply

    I tried the Xubuntu LiveCD on a 3.5 year old laptop (emachines, 2.8GHz CPU, 256MB RAM) but had problems with speed and display (the panel and status bars would not display). Before I get the nerve to install, does the WM let the graphical Update Manager run? I do think I can run apt-get or aptitude on command line, but was just wondering.

  9. By Cosmin on Jan 5, 2008 | Reply

    Synaptic is working perfectly in Fluxbuntu and yes, it provides a graphical way to update the system.

    You system was running slow probably because of the small amount of RAM and the speed of the optical unit (bit slower on notebooks compared to desktops).

  10. By Marti on Jan 9, 2008 | Reply

    Just saw your reply.

    Thanks for the info about graphical Update Manager on fluxbuntu. I have another 256MB RAM for the emachines on order. I had “tried” a 1GB RAM in the extra slot but the laptop stopped booting up after it was installed. Taking it out (hence, back at 256MB default, on-board memory) let me use the laptop again.

    I have been told 512 would be more than OK for Xubuntu, but I think I might try fluxbuntu anyway.

    Wish me luck…..I’ll need it.

    Marti

  11. By yamaplos on Feb 3, 2008 | Reply

    Trying Flexbuntu on a Toshiba 465CDX, 64 Ram dunno processor but probably was pentium. Used to run Win95 until today :-p. It’s still loading, but meanwhile let me thank you for the review - wish this level of info were available in the official site. So thanks to Google too…

  12. By Darinb6 on Jun 20, 2008 | Reply

    Does Fluxbuntu get regular updates like xubuntu

  13. By Micolabtechs on Aug 26, 2008 | Reply

    Thanks

    This is a great alternative to those especially that want Emachines (machines for net use mainly)
    Graphic rendering was fast as well as application speed was fairly good.

    another good thing about fluxbuntu that is interesting is the login manger that is why i chose fluxbuntu over puppy linux (which appeared faster in my evaluation)

    i wont recheck this post and if you need additional info on desktop deployment email my friend at becoolio@gmail.com

  1. 1 Trackback(s)
  2. Dec 17, 2007: BlackNight’s cyberhome » Al doilea review…

Post a Comment